Following NCAA President, Mark Emmert's, halftime interview with Jim Nantz on Sunday, the engine was revved up again. The catalyst for the debate not worth debating: the never ending saga of the one-and-done in college basketball. A topic that has been thought provoking enough that Kentucky Wildcats head coach John Calipari has had to continuously defend his means. Regarding John Calipari's usage of the one-and-done, Emmert defended the 53 year old coach saying, "Any coach who's using the rules and operating inside the rules to provide them with a competitive advantage is certainly within their prerogative." On his Final Four squad, the Kentucky coach has six freshman players, including player of the year candidate, Anthony Davis. Those six clocked 4,014 minutes played in the 36 games prior to their victory over Baylor, three hundred minutes more than last year's freshman class. In the interview on CBS, Emmert expressed his desire to amend the rule to at least make it a two-and-done rule, stating the current system is "a travesty of the whole notion of student as athlete." The question becomes, does implementing a recyclable, one-and-done system give the team a better chance to win a National Championship?

Original Story

2 comments so far,Add yours

  1. It does give a team a better chance to win a National Championship, but having a freshman filled team does not guarantee anything. Players need that guy that's been around (Kemba Walker last year) to guide when things start getting weird in a game.

    Who do you think will win the Final Four?

  2. I think Kentucky will win the whole thing. But I wouldn't mind seeing eitheir Kansas/Ohio St cutting down the nets.

    As the whole freshman thing goes, I think the NCAA/NBA need to come up with a solid solution that allows the student athletes to get better scholarships than just the athletes. Look what Michael Beasley could have done for a school like K-State if he had stayed. Now the coach is gone and that school will need to find itself a new identity.